Trait rotor_tools::sync::Replaceable
[−]
[src]
pub trait Replaceable: Machine { fn empty(&self) -> Self; fn restart(self, _scope: &mut Scope<Self::Context>) -> Response<Self, Self::Seed> { ... } }
A trait which allows to replace the state machine with dummy/null/None
Since we put machine (used with Mutexed
) into a Arc<Mutex<M>>
we need
to replace it with some other value while the real value is moved off the
state machine to be able to replace it by code, having self by-value.
When the thread working with the state machine panics while machine is
moved off the place, the poisoned lock is left with Replaceable::empty
value. When lock is poisoned we unwrap the value and use it as a valid
state machine. So you can continue to work after panic with the clean
state after a crash (perhaps if the panic was in different thread).
The text above means you should be able to "restart" the state machine
from the empty()
state.
Required Methods
fn empty(&self) -> Self
Return the empty value that may be used as replacement
The method must be cheap to compute. Because it's executed on
every action of a state machine (for mem::replace
)
Note in case the lock is poisoned (panic was received while keeping
state machine locked, perhaps in another thread), the empty
value
is used on the poisoned value, before restart()
is called. This
means you only want to use read-only parts of self
here (better
none at all, but that's not always possible).
Provided Methods
fn restart(self, _scope: &mut Scope<Self::Context>) -> Response<Self, Self::Seed>
Restart a state machine from empty()
state
This method is called before calling any other action methods when lock holding the state machine was poisoned.
Note that after the restart
current event is discarded, it's assumed
that state machine is already arranged to receive some new events
(i.e. it's useless to keep old ready()
event if new connection is
just being established)
While you can check the state of the old machine (a self
), and even
return it as is, it's strongly discouraged, as you can't know exact
kind of failure that happened in other thread (when lock was
poisoned). But in case protocol is super-simple (like line-based
without exceptions) and it's not security critical (i.e. monitoring
using graphite), you may reuse old state machine or parts there of.
Default implementation is just to panic